Muni Budgets May Not Be as Strong as Perceived

Nov. 26, 2024 - 4 minutes 30 seconds
Top-down view of a pool of water in a water treatment plant.

Overview:

  • Overall municipal spending growth is expected to persist in the low single digit range, but we saw negative revisions to last year's outlook.
  • Cash outlays negatively diverged versus last year's survey and are lagging capex budgets.
  • PFAS water treatment is important, but implementation timelines could be challenging to achieve.
  • Increasing market demand in data centers increases demand for water and could place strain on local resources.
  • Survey participants expect reduced federal funding for future budgets as a result of incoming policy changes

Our 10th annual U.S. municipal spending survey tracked outlooks at municipalities across the country. We targeted approximately 50 municipalities. In addition to our survey results, we explored the use cases for water cooling technology for data center related markets.

The TD Cowen Insight

The results of our survey were surprising this year. Given federal money and a still-strong economy, we expected universally positive reads. However, budgets in 2024 coalesced at lower-than-expected growth versus 2023 forward expectations, and cash outlays materially lagged. This result calls into question 2025 growth that is already expected to moderate.

Surprisingly Low Growth Versus Expectations for 2024

Our survey last year was very positive, and given nothing had fundamentally changed regarding broad economic conditions or federal funding into the sector, we expected overwhelmingly positive results. That simply wasn't the result. Surprisingly, the actual 2024 growth came in below what was anticipated last year proving to be the largest negative gap versus expectations in the 10 years of our survey. The cash outlays versus budget also slipped substantially.

In 2023, 88% of respondents expected to spend >60% of their capex budget and 36% expected to spend 80-100%. This year almost all respondents were 60% or lower. This is a substantial negative divergence without an obvious catalyst. While respondents generally see low single digit to mid single digit budget growth into 2025, the amount expecting 5+% operating budget growth was nearly cut in half year on year. The negative revisions versus initial expectations for 2024 coupled with the weakness in actual outlays keeps us on alert for negative 2025 revisions.

Muni Spending and Growth on a Less Stable Foundation

In our 10th annual spending survey, we received budget outlooks directly from 50 U.S. municipalities both large and small. We collaborated with our colleagues, the TD Cowen Washington Research Group, on progress regarding policy decisions affecting the broader water space. Our work suggests that while spending in dollars remains healthy, the magnitude of recent growth came in below what was implied by our survey last year. Cash outlays – which were very strong last year relative to budget – have declined substantially on a relative basis. Growth is expected to continue into 2025 but seems to be on a less stable foundation than we would have thought.

Our takeaways from the recent Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference highlight the importance of Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) treatment across the sector, though many expect current timelines to be overly ambitious given the technology currently available (largely on the testing and disposal side).

Our full report also contains a look at water considerations from the anticipated data center buildout. It is well known that increasingly powerful data centers require large quantities of water. However, the extent to which these facilities could place unmanageable strain on local resources will likely be a topic of rising importance over the coming years.

Financial and Industry Model Implications

Consensus forward growth for the water sector is on average over 5%. Order growth at the industry leader was negative in June before rebounding in September. We believe this has near-term downside risk and is a fair proxy for other players in the space. A broader cool down in water-related growth seems likely, and our survey results support that view. It also remains to be seen to what extent federal money is more of a state or local replacement of funds rather than purely additive.

Capital Spending Moves Higher but is Decelerating

Capital spending (based on publicly available data for water supply and sewage/waste disposal) has continued to move higher but is decelerating at high gross dollar levels. We will look to see if delays related to actual deployment of federal funds continues, and if year-on-year growth flips negative or drives another leg higher.

Participants will have to work through potential policy implications of an incoming Trump administration on existing and future U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulation and federal funding disbursement. For the second straight year, all respondents expect to receive funds from the Infrastructure and Jobs Act – although this year, nearly all participants expect the contribution to be under 50% of the budget. This finding is a negative shift versus the prior year where approximately half of survey participants expected it to contribute over 50%. Perhaps this helps explain cash outlays lagging budget growth – something to monitor.

Subscribing clients can read the full report, Muni Budgets May Not Be As Strong As Perceived - Ahead Of The Curve Series, on the TD One Portal

The views or opinions expressed herein represent the personal views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of TD Securities or its affiliates.

This material is intended to provide commentary on the market for commodities discussed herein.

Not Advice: The information contained in this material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide professional, investment or any other type of advice or recommendation, or to create a fiduciary relationship. Neither TD Securities (USA) LLC (“TD Securities USA”) nor any of its affiliates (collectively, “TD”) makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, completeness, appropriateness or sufficiency for any purpose of any information included in this material. Certain information may have been provided by third-party sources and, while believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified by TD, and its accuracy or completeness acannot be guaranteed. You should not make an investment decision in reliance on this material, which is intended to provide only brief comments on the topics addressed, and is based on information that is likely to change without notice.

Not Securities or Derivatives Research: This material has not been produced, reviewed or approved by TD’s securities or derivatives research departments. The views of the author may differ from others at TD, including TD securities or derivatives research analysts.

Not Independent: The views expressed in this material may not be independent of the interests of TD. TD may engage in conflicting activities, including principal trading before or after posting this material, or other services involving commodities discussed in this material, or related financial products. TD may have a financial interest in the commodities discussed in this material, including, without limitation, a financial product that references such commodities.

Not An Offer or Solicitation: Nothing contained in this material is, or should be construed as, an offer, a solicitation of an offer or an invitation to buy or sell any commodity, or any financial product that references such commodity, and it is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to law.

Risk of Loss. Transactions in commodities, and financial instruments that reference commodities, involve risk of loss, and are subject to the risks of fluctuating prices. You should weigh potential benefits against the risks. Past performance is no indicator of future performance and the Materials are not intended to forecast or predict future events.


Portrait of Joseph Giordano

Managing Director, Diversified Industrials, Automation & Robotics Research Analyst, TD Cowen

Portrait of Joseph Giordano


Managing Director, Diversified Industrials, Automation & Robotics Research Analyst, TD Cowen

Portrait of Joseph Giordano


Managing Director, Diversified Industrials, Automation & Robotics Research Analyst, TD Cowen

Joseph Giordano joined TD Cowen in 2013 as part of the acquisition of Dahlman Rose and currently covers diversified industrials, automation & robotics. He joined Dahlman Rose in March 2011 as an associate on the metals & mining team. Prior to joining Dahlman Rose, Mr. Giordano spent four years at Deloitte & Touche in the financial services audit and commercial mortgage backed securitization practices and three years at Kingdon Capital Management.

Mr. Giordano received a bachelor of science in finance and accounting from the Stern School of Business at New York University in 2004. He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a Certified Public Accountant in the state of New York.

Portrait of John Miller

Managing Director, Washington Research Group - ESG and Sustainability Policy Analyst, TD Cowen

Portrait of John Miller


Managing Director, Washington Research Group - ESG and Sustainability Policy Analyst, TD Cowen

Portrait of John Miller


Managing Director, Washington Research Group - ESG and Sustainability Policy Analyst, TD Cowen

John Miller joined TD Cowen Washington Research Group in September 2021 and covers ESG and sustainability policy. TD Cowen Washington Research Group was recently named #1 in the Institutional Investor Washington Strategy category. The team has been consistently ranked among the top macro policy teams for the past decade. Mr. Miller previously served as a vice president and senior ESG research analyst at Calvert Research and Management, part of Morgan Stanley Investment Management, where he developed and built a quantitative, company-level ESG risk/reward assessment framework targeted towards the global energy and utility sectors. Mr. Miller supported the index development and security selection process for Calvert’s Global Energy Solutions Fund and Global Water Fund. Mr. Miller also worked at the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as branch chief in the Office of Enforcement, Division of Analytics and Surveillance. Earlier, he served as Technical and Policy Advisor to a FERC commissioner and as an energy analyst in FERC’s Office of Enforcement.

Mr. Miller holds a B.A. in economic history and political science from The George Washington University, and a Master’s in global history from The London School of Economics and Political Science, where he focused on developmental economics. John also holds the Fundamentals of Sustainability Accounting certification, which is granted by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB).

Material prepared by the TD Cowen Washington Research Group is intended as commentary on political, economic, or market conditions and is not intended as a research report as defined by applicable regulation.