A "Mighty Yuan" Belief Clashes with Devaluation Rumours

May 17, 2024 - 7 minutes 30 seconds
Folded yuan bills placed on top of several U.S. dollar bills.

Rumours of a sudden CNY devaluation are rife, which are clearly at odds with the People's Bank of China (PBoC) "stable yuan" mantra over the past year. We don't foresee a sudden CNY devaluation though, due to several factors, which we discuss in this note.

Devaluation Rumours Trigger Unpleasant 2015 Memories

PBoC's relentlessly stronger USDCNY fixings have supported the CNY versus its peers, raising doubts over China's export competitiveness. USDCNY has traded in a tight range and is now just a whisker away from the top end of the 2% band. The fixings pattern is also eerily similar to 2015, just before China's devaluation, and investors are on the lookout, with some flagging a currency war in Asia given the weakness in the JPY, KRW and TWD amid an unstoppable USD. We expect more USD strength ahead and this begs the question if the PBoC will capitulate on its efforts to defend the yuan as a weaker CNY could be preferred to support economic growth.

While we can understand the logic of a weaker CNY to support the economy, we doubt the PBoC wants to trigger a disorderly move which will go against its "stable yuan" mantra in the past year even when USDCNY traded to a high of C¥7.34.

USDCNY Fixings vs Spot Price Action Brings Back Eerie Memories of 2015 Devaluation

Is the Commodity Market Telling Us Something?

Some investors have flagged the rise in copper inventories and PBoC's gold purchases as signposts of a looming devaluation attempt. It is a tail risk to be mindful of, but we wouldn't overplay these two data points.

  • Copper: We see the rise in copper inventories as reflective of weak demand from industrial users in China. With China's housing policy pivoting toward a "destocking" direction, property construction in China is unlikely to pick up steam, explaining this acceleration in inventories.
  • Gold: We were early to highlight this bizarre buying activity in gold markets: Uncovering Gold's Mystery Buyer. With CNY under pressure, authorities likely resorted to buying non-USD denominated assets and selling U.S. Treasuries to suppress the rise in the USD, explaining the aggressive nature of the gold purchases.

PBoC Has Been Gradually Stockpiling Gold

Why a Devaluation is Unlikely

Xi's "Mighty Yuan" Belief and Internationalisation Efforts

At the start of 2024, President Xi circulated his ideas on shaping China into a financial power. In particular, Xi saw the need for a 'mighty' currency, a strong central bank and strong financial institutions to attain this goal. These remarks underpin Xi's desire to increase the internationalization of the yuan.

Tracking the progress of CNY internationalisation, two points stand out:

  • The CNY is the fourth most active currency in the world for global payments with a share of 4.7% in March 2024, surpassing even the JPY. Given that CNY accounted for <0.1% of global settlement when SWIFT started to track CNY in 2010, this is a big leap forward.
  • Cross-border receipts and payments settled in yuan in 2023 hit C¥52.3, approximately 4 times the 2025 levels of 2015 levels. Any sudden devaluation would greatly hamper China's efforts to promote yuan usage, raising the hurdle to persuade foreign companies to transact in yuan in the future.

RMB's share of global currency payments surpassed JPY in March

The Intervention Bill Is Not Too High

Before the August 2015 devaluation, the PBoC spent U$300B over the prior four quarters from its official FX reserves to defend the yuan, drawing down from a high of U$4T in reserves in Q2 2024. One might argue that sustained intervention is too costly for China, and with the PBoC nowhere near hiking rates soon, another devaluation to realign the CNY makes sense.

Since 2017, PBoC's official FX reserves has remained flat which is odd given China's current account surplus. A plausible explanation is that state banks probably stopped transferring their FX purchases to the PBoC and have become PBoC's actors for FX interventions. Using FX settlements data from SAFE, we can back out the intervention bill and estimate an "unofficial" FX reserves measure.

By our estimates, state banks have been selling the USD to defend the yuan since Q4 2022, clocking U$20B in March 2024 and totalling U$64B over the past two quarters. In contrast to the U$300B that the PBoC spent over 2014/2015, the current intervention effort of U$64B since October 2023 is smaller and more manageable. We believe the PBoC has the tools and funds needed and won't hesitate to smooth out any excessive weakness in the CNY, sticking to its "stable yuan" mantra.

Financial Stability Is Paramount

Havoc in financial markets is likely the outcome after a sudden devaluation. We can expect heavy portfolio outflows as confidence in China's capital markets is undermined. Authorities' earlier efforts to stabilise capital markets have just begun to bear fruit, with China registering strong portfolio inflows YTD.

Equities & bonds inflows totalled U$42.5B in March on a three-month rolling sum basis, a level not seen since late 2021. The CSI300 is now also up 15% from the trough in late-January which has attracted back foreign investors' interest and inflows. Investors are feeling more positive on the capital markets outlook, reflecting the top brass efforts and the easy monetary policy outlook, which bodes well for bonds.

We doubt the Politburo will rubber stamp a devaluation and undo all the good work thus far. The last thing China's leaders want is Wall Street echoing the "China is uninvestable" tag again.

Exports Engine Not Collapsing

A strong yuan isn't doing any favours for exports, but export growth hasn't slumped to a degree that warrants a devaluation. Looking at quarterly trends, exports are gradually recovering after the sharp plunge in 2023 while the pace of global trade growth is set to double this year, which could put a floor under China's exports.

In 2015, the PBoC cited a high effective exchange rate as a reason behind the devaluation. China's real effective exchange rate (REER) - a measure that’s adjusted for inflation and trade with other nations - climbed 14% in a year, which presumably was too much for authorities to bear, especially given the poor growth outlook at that time. However, the REER has now retreated to 91.7 in March 2024 from a high of 106.5 in March 2022, and implies an improvement in China's trade competitiveness suggesting little need for a devaluation to boost exports.

China REER Is Notwhere Near 2015 Levels

FX Market Views: CNY Valuation-Price Disconnect Implies No Need for Intervention

Going into the U.S. election, the CNY's valuation may prove to be an issue. Looking at our Low-Frequency Fair Value (LFFV) framework, CNY sits 11% too cheap relative to our LFFV estimate against the USD, in stark contrast to the mere 2-5% gap in 2015 when devaluation occurred. Nations' FX policies may start to feature in the run-up to the Presidential elections, and we think China does not want to draw attention to the CNY. There are few economic benefits of a weaker FX, especially when domestic factors (e.g., housing/consumers) are the culprits of the slowdown.

However, what if the PBoC does go ahead with a devaluation? Which currencies will be the worst-hit? We've looked at the sensitivities (i.e., betas) of Asia and some G10 FX against the CFETS (trade-weighted yuan) in recent months and found that AUD, KRW and NZD are the most sensitive to moves in the CFETS and a sudden devaluation would likely trigger significant weakness in these currencies. Traditionally, the Antipodeans and South Korea have significant economic linkages to China, so these findings don't come as a surprise.

In summary, we do see scope for USDCNY to head towards C¥7.40 by year-end, reflecting a mixture of further USD strength and CNY weakness. We haven't changed our view that CNY is likely to underperform against global FX. Our main discomfort with the CNY devaluation rumour is that China won't tolerate any sudden moves in the currency and risk triggering a confidence crisis and capital flight. China may eventually concede on its CNY fixings and loosen its grip on CNY, but we suspect the PBoC will smooth out CNY weakness and not risk speculators piling into shorts and trigger heavy losses in the currency.

CNY Trading Too Cheap Relative to Fundamentals

Rates Market Views: Devaluation Would See Treasuries Cheapen Sharply

Treasury market investors live in perpetual fear of China's FX intervention since this involves China selling Treasuries en masse to fuel CNY purchases. While Chinese holdings have declined to about 4% of the marketable Treasury debt from a peak of 15% in 2011, we estimate that China still owns approximately U$1.1T in Treasuries. China shed nearly U$500B in holdings from 2014 and 2016 as part of its intervention efforts — a move which coincided with an enormous drawdown in China's FX reserves.

While part of the decline in Chinese Treasury holdings may have been accomplished by China stopping purchases and allowing some of its holdings to mature, China sold Treasuries outright in late-2015. This selling significantly unsettled the Treasury market at the time, cheapening Treasuries sharply relative to Overnight Indexed Swap (OIS).

After a period of cheapening over the past year, Treasuries have begun to richen vs OIS in recent months as bank portfolios have started buying fixed income again. However, any indication of selling by China would likely cheapen Treasuries sharply, tightening two-to-seven-year swap spreads. Outright yields may continue to move with macro drivers, but we expect Treasury valuations to shift materially on any FX intervention.

Chinese Treasury Holdings Have Declined Sharply Since 2023, Keeping Investors Nervous

Subscribing clients can read the full report, A "Mighty Yuan" Belief Clashes With Devaluation Rumours, via the TD One Portal

The views or opinions expressed herein represent the personal views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of TD Securities or its affiliates.

This material is intended to provide commentary on the market for commodities discussed herein.

Not Advice: The information contained in this material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide professional, investment or any other type of advice or recommendation, or to create a fiduciary relationship. Neither TD Securities (USA) LLC (“TD Securities USA”) nor any of its affiliates (collectively, “TD”) makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, completeness, appropriateness or sufficiency for any purpose of any information included in this material. Certain information may have been provided by third-party sources and, while believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified by TD, and its accuracy or completeness acannot be guaranteed. You should not make an investment decision in reliance on this material, which is intended to provide only brief comments on the topics addressed, and is based on information that is likely to change without notice.

Not Securities or Derivatives Research: This material has not been produced, reviewed or approved by TD’s securities or derivatives research departments. The views of the author may differ from others at TD, including TD securities or derivatives research analysts.

Not Independent: The views expressed in this material may not be independent of the interests of TD. TD may engage in conflicting activities, including principal trading before or after posting this material, or other services involving commodities discussed in this material, or related financial products. TD may have a financial interest in the commodities discussed in this material, including, without limitation, a financial product that references such commodities.

Not An Offer or Solicitation: Nothing contained in this material is, or should be construed as, an offer, a solicitation of an offer or an invitation to buy or sell any commodity, or any financial product that references such commodity, and it is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to law.

Risk of Loss. Transactions in commodities, and financial instruments that reference commodities, involve risk of loss, and are subject to the risks of fluctuating prices. You should weigh potential benefits against the risks. Past performance is no indicator of future performance and the Materials are not intended to forecast or predict future events.


Portrait of Alex Loo

Vice President and FX and Macro Strategist, TD Securities

Portrait of Alex Loo


Vice President and FX and Macro Strategist, TD Securities

Portrait of Alex Loo


Vice President and FX and Macro Strategist, TD Securities

Alex is an FX and Macro Strategist for TD Securities in Singapore, providing research and analysis on Asia-Pacific economies and markets to clients. Prior to joining TD Securities, Alex worked as an economist in the Ministry of Trade & Industry (Singapore). Alex holds a MSc in Economics from University College London and is a CFA charterholder.

Portrait of Daniel Ghali

Senior Commodity Strategist, TD Securities

Portrait of Daniel Ghali


Senior Commodity Strategist, TD Securities

Portrait of Daniel Ghali


Senior Commodity Strategist, TD Securities

Daniel is a Commodity Strategist for TD Securities in the FICC Strategy group, based in Toronto. He provides research and market analysis of precious metals, base metals, and energy markets, used in producing trading strategies that are disseminated to the institutional trading desks in Toronto, New York, London and Singapore, along with the broader client base. He is well known for his Quantamental approach, which has allowed him to develop data-driven tools, bespoke insights and tactical trading strategies across global markets. Daniel has the conviction to recommend bold views when opportunities warrant and has built a track record of providing sobering insights. Daniel holds a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Toronto, and is also a CFA charterholder.

Portrait of Gennadiy Goldberg

Head of U.S. Rates Strategy, TD Securities

Portrait of Gennadiy Goldberg


Head of U.S. Rates Strategy, TD Securities

Portrait of Gennadiy Goldberg


Head of U.S. Rates Strategy, TD Securities

Gennadiy is Head of U.S. Rates Strategy, providing market commentary on interest rates and the U.S. economy and focusing on Treasuries, swaps, TIPS, and supranational and agency debt. He also focuses on US fiscal dynamics, monetary policy functioning issues, and front-end markets. Gennadiy was ranked top five in the Federal Agency Debt Strategy category in the Institutional Investor’s All-America Fixed Income Research team surveys between 2017 and 2021.